Strategies of Cognitive Warfare via Social Media and Their Implications for Internal Stability

A Field Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33282/abaa.v18i73.1309

Keywords:

Internal stability, the Iraqi public, cognitive warfare, social media, perception engineering

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to identify the role of cognitive warfare, which is considered a form of non-traditional conflict, and to reveal how social media platforms are used to shape public perception and reshape public attitudes, as well as to identify the most prominent digital tools employed in this context, such as voice dubbing, deepfakes, echo chambers, emotional appeals, and guided trends. The study also seeks to measure the extent to which social media users in Iraq are exposed to the content of cognitive warfare and how this affects their perceptions of the concept of internal stability and manifestations of social characteristics.
Methodology: The researcher employed a descriptive approach using a field survey method, administering a questionnaire to a sample of social media users in Iraq, with the aim of collecting and analyzing data relevant to the study’s topic, and to identify the nature of the relationship between their exposure to information warfare content and their perceptions of internal stability, the level of social security, and trust in institutions.
Results: The results of the analysis revealed a clear correlation between the level of exposure to targeted content related to cognitive warfare and its impact on perceptions of stability, social security, and trust in institutions. The results also showed that this impact may occur indirectly through other practices and methods, particularly through new tools such as emotional rhetoric and targeted activist content. The impact of this content may extend to individuals’ perceptions and behavior, as well as its repercussions on society, which may contribute to reshaping societal norms and deepening polarization and social division.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the cognitive warfare on social media poses a growing challenge to societal security due to its ability to shape collective perception and digitally reproduce fears and doubts, thereby highlighting the need for various national efforts focused on cognitive resilience, raising awareness among internet users, building their capacity to counter mechanisms of perception manipulation, and mitigating their effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216-9221. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115

Bernal, A., Carter, C., Singh, I., Cao, K., & Madreperla, O. (2020). Cognitive warfare: An attack on truth and thought. NATO and Johns Hopkins University: Baltimore MD, USA. https://web.archive.org/web/20230416222036/https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/Cognitive%20Warfare.pdf

Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation. Oxford: University of Oxford. https://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/posts/the-global-disinformation-order-2019-global-inventory-of-organised-social-media-manipulation/

Chesney, B., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753-1820. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26891938

Claverie, B., & Du Cluzel, F. (2022). “Cognitive Warfare”: The Advent of the Concept of “Cognitics” in the Field of Warfare. In C. Bernard, P. Baptiste, B. Norbou, & C. François du (Eds.), Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance (pp. 2, 1-7). NATO Collaboration Support Office. https://hal.science/hal-03635889

DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Iraq. DATAREPORTAL. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-iraq

de Cock Buning, M. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/386085

Du Cluzel, F. (2021). Cognitive Warfare. Nato Act Innovation Hub. https://innovationhub-act.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/20210113_CW-Final-v2-.pdf

El-Filali, D. S. E. H. (2025). Egyptian Satellite News Channels' Coverage of Fifth-Generation Warfare Mechanisms and Their Risks to National Security, and Elite Attitudes Toward Them: An Analytical Field Study. Menoufiya University Faculty of Arts Journal, 36(143.4). https://doi.org/10.21608/sjam.2025.414420.2722

Kahneman, D., & Egan, P. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (Vol. 1, No. 0, pp. 1-5). New York: Farrar, straus and Giroux.

Ognyanova, K., Lazer, D., Robertson, R. E., & Wilson, C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-024

Paul, C., & Matthews, M. (2016). The Russian “Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda Model: Why It Might Work and Options to Counter It. RAND Corporation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02439

Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton:: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9781400890521

Vasist, P. N., Chatterjee, D., & Krishnan, S. (2024). The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narrative. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 663-688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10390-w

World Economic Forum. (2023). Global Risks Report 2023 (18 ed.). World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2023/

Key Dates

Received

2025-12-18

Revised

2026-07-18

Accepted

2026-07-27

Published

2026-09-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Neamah, H. A. (2026). Strategies of Cognitive Warfare via Social Media and Their Implications for Internal Stability: A Field Study. ALBAHITH ALALAMI, 18(73). https://doi.org/10.33282/abaa.v18i73.1309

Similar Articles

21-30 of 443

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.